13 Comments

Didn’t read article due to more relevant facts that real victims of Epstein’s ring, aka The 2006 DC Madam case, are being covered up by media and abused by US Officials & cohorts. Shame on any knowingly supporting medias coverup.

Expand full comment

This world is seriously screwed up adults are the true evil on this planet!!!!

Expand full comment

Titles given to people don't define what type of person u are!!!!

Expand full comment

Who runs this memory hole? Can anyone tell??. Thanks

Expand full comment

Google comes up with all sorts of unusual information regarding Epstein. Like the apparent friendship between Lynn Forrester Rothschild and Epstein (not really reported in the press when articles appear on who he mixed with socially)....and allegedly an unusual transaction involving a house that belonged to her which she sold to Epstein apparently at 8.5million below its market value.

I found one article that mentioned her brother owned a private terminal at Teterboro airport in New Jersey under the name Million Air...one used frequently by Epstein on his trips. Its funny what you uncover the more you search.

I believe Epstein helped wealthy clients reduce their tax bills and I suspect he personally was into money laundering. I also believe he probably could have been involved in drug trafficking. He found loopholes. He was clearly murdered as too many big names were involved with him and getting up to no good.....so he had to go. However, I must admit I find it strange as to why Epstein's brother seems to not be under further investigation in this whole tawdry affair. Of course, he may be innocent and not involved in messing about with underage girls ....but was he involved more deeply in the financial affairs of his brother? He has benefitted financially from his brother's death via inheritance. He has to know the truth of what Epstein was doing for big names. I don't believe Epstein's huge wealth was made from honest work. He was a hustler. More investigation into his financial affairs should be done and if he did something illegal for clients then they must pay up. The focus should not be mainly on his and others sexual leanings. There has to be a paper trail regarding all his financial transactions for people. Forensic Accountants should be digging.

It has taken a few years for JP Morgan to be questioned about their Private Client relationship with Epstein because of an ongoing court case. Yet Deutsche Bank were fined years ago for having him as a Private Client and being accused of not being more careful when it came to monitoring their clients unusual payments to girls etc.

Expand full comment

Would nefarious US intelligence departments “willing to look the other way” and allow for underage crimes so long as they could extort powerful people to work with US ?

Expand full comment

The Justice system in the US is dead. The Elites pull the strings and the rest are sheep for slaughter!

Expand full comment

Men will always be men such things has been doing on since long, since mankind came in existence will never stop .. kings queens so on ,history speaks so harem is example .

Expand full comment

😉😊

Expand full comment

Thought for sure the self snuff tape, or at least a good copy, was in The Kingdom, per highest bid . . .#the space tales

Expand full comment

JEWISH TALMUD:

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ". (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo)."

(footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

Expand full comment